forced BE [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2013-08-01 13:59 (4361 d 07:18 ago) – Posting: # 11142
Views: 26,610

Dear sam!

❝ Hi John


So far as I know has our captain the name Großer Meister :-D.

❝ The ratio for AUCt and AUCinf are 83.82 and 84.91 and the corresponding CIs are (79.28% - 88.61%) and (80.68% - 89.35%) respectively. The subjects evaluated for this trial is 124.


That smells like forced bioequivalence. Not sure if FDA assessors like that (better quite sure they don't).

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,430 posts in 4,931 threads, 1,677 registered users;
57 visitors (0 registered, 57 guests [including 17 identified bots]).
Forum time: 21:18 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To know that we know what we know,
and to know that we do not know what we do not know,
that is true knowledge.    Nicolaus Copernicus

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5