Reliable estimates? [NCA / SHAM]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2018-06-20 03:12 (2577 d 10:44 ago) – Posting: # 18925
Views: 3,984

Hi Babe_Ruth,

❝ I read in a PK report: "Where less than 3 quantifiable concentrations, AUC is not reported."


Bad English?

❝ The way I see it, if you only have two sequential concentrations above quantifiable limit, then you can generate a Tmax, but you can't be sure of the accuracy of Tmax, especially if Cmax is barely above quantitation limit of the assay used.


I know that some people report “Cmax” based on two concentrations and “AUC” on three. IMHO, that’s crap. I don’t belong to the club of guideline-addicts butI leave it you counting words like sufficient, reliable, appropriate, accurate

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,428 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,683 registered users;
33 visitors (0 registered, 33 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:56 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To know that we know what we know,
and to know that we do not know what we do not know,
that is true knowledge.    Nicolaus Copernicus

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5