‘alpha’ of scaled ABE? [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-03-15 18:27 (4495 d 21:02 ago) – Posting: # 10203
Views: 26,272

Dear Detlew!

❝ A rather natural choice IMHO would be to calculate the power at the border(s) of the widened BE acceptance limits.


Agree.

GMR=1.25 if CV<=0.3 or GMR=exp(0.8925742*CV2se(CV)) if CV>0.3 for the FDA RSABE

GMR=1.25 if CV<=0.3 or GMR=exp(0.7601283*CV2se(CV)) if CV>0.3 for the EMA scABEL and cap on if CV>0.5


<nitpicking>

I would prefer a GMR of 0.80 since PowerTOST employs simulations – remember the “rounding thread”? ;-)

</nitpicking>

Which designs / sample sizes have you used? I’m struggling reproducing your numbers.

❝ Interesting! At least for me :yes:.


For me as well. I will ask the two Lászlós and maybe Panos Macheras.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,427 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,677 registered users;
42 visitors (0 registered, 42 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:29 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Many people tend to look at programming styles and languages like religions:
if you belong to one, you cannot belong to others.
But this analogy is another fallacy.    Niklaus Wirth

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5