Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Dear d_labes,

❝ Since I'm very interested in using R in planning and

We've all known that and it's not a news. You're definitely a pro useR, as well as Power to know of course.

❝ evaluation of BE/BA studies, but as you know I'm an Old scummy SAS dog

❝ somehow lazy to make the transition, here some questions for my and

I heard of this before... again "Welcome on board!"

1. Yes --> a, b, c & d
   
2. a, b (because of a) & c (also because of coding Bear, and others which may not be BE/BA related packages, such ivivc, stab, pkfit & tdm)
   
3. a, b & d
   
4. No and Yes. myself? No! but some Bear users may be YES from different countries, such as Australia or Japan... Once I got validation query from one of users for Bear.--> a and c (I guess)
   
5. only if one day Power to know merges R... but I guess it will not happen.
   

❝ So, friends, since you all have nicknames, except the well-known Admin and

❝ me, I guarantee handling of your answers as strictly anonymous

Why do you say that? Most Bear users tell us that they're very happy about using Bear. Don't be shy.