LLOQ/2 for BQLs not suggested [PK / PD]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2015-06-08 14:35 (3681 d 04:37 ago) – Posting: # 14925
Views: 10,307

Dear all,

just found an interesting statement in an EPAR of 2013:

The CHMP raised questions about the appropriateness of calculations using below limit of quanti­ta­tion (BLQ) and exclusion of data. The applicant provided re-evaluated PK parameters and statis­tical analysis not replacing BLQ with the half value of lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ).

(my emphasis)

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,427 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,676 registered users;
34 visitors (0 registered, 34 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:12 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Many people tend to look at programming styles and languages like religions:
if you belong to one, you cannot belong to others.
But this analogy is another fallacy.    Niklaus Wirth

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5