Bizarre discussion… [PK / PD]

posted by janmacek – Czech Republic, 2015-02-17 18:42 (3791 d 20:55 ago) – Posting: # 14443
Views: 14,966

Dear Helmut,

this is (and was) totally clear to me. But was that comparison not meaningful at all? I have correctly guessed that the drug was a pro-drug, so this is the additional information yielded from this comparison. And msnaimar (and we all) has the experience from previous studies that in the vast majority of cases the value of AUC > value of Cmax with the units specified, so he/she suspected an error.

I also always check the aberrant results (aberrant from other values obtained in the same experiment or aberrant from other studies), so it was correct that msnaimar asked his question. The ratio Cmax/AUC > 1 (with the units specified) says something about the shape and width of the concentration-time curve, i.e. the curve is sharpe and narrow.

Of course, if we would have also the values of tmax and t1/2 we could say more about the shape of the PK curve, but you can make some conclusions based only on Cmax and AUC.

With kind regards,

Jan

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,427 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,677 registered users;
36 visitors (0 registered, 36 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:38 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Many people tend to look at programming styles and languages like religions:
if you belong to one, you cannot belong to others.
But this analogy is another fallacy.    Niklaus Wirth

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5