Cmax value higher than AUC [PK / PD]

posted by Dr_Dan  – Germany, 2015-02-17 09:11 (3792 d 17:42 ago) – Posting: # 14434
Views: 15,071

Hi ElMaestro

❝ It doesn't make sense. At least not to me.

❝ AUCt is a concentration integrated over time, Cmax is a concentration.


You are right that msnaimar can not directly compare two different units on the one hand but on the other hand the question is reasonable. Is it possible that Cmax > AUCt? IMHO not. Cmax just represents one point of the curve (o.k. it is the highest) but AUC represents all points under the curve i.e. Cmax + all the rest and therefore the value for AUC must be >> as the value for Cmax provided that you use the same dimension for concentration (in our case ng/ml), right?
Please explain if I am completely wrong
Kind regards
Dr_Dan

Kind regards and have a nice day
Dr_Dan

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,427 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,678 registered users;
30 visitors (0 registered, 30 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:53 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

No matter what side of the argument you are on,
you always find people on your side
that you wish were on the other.    Thomas Berger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5