post additional studies [PK / PD]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2015-01-13 18:46 (3828 d 02:07 ago) – Posting: # 14284
Views: 9,645

Hi Nobody,

❝ Maybe we should collect some data to support the nonsense-theory for this parameter? :-)


❝ I will post here additional studies as I find them...


Excellent idea.
Let's see the numbers. In particular, what sample size is necessary to prove BE for a drug against itself if we look at Ctrough? Once calculate please tell me what level of confidence would that sample size give us for AUCt and Cmax?

Would be great to get some insight.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,428 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,686 registered users;
92 visitors (0 registered, 92 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 21:53 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

No matter what side of the argument you are on,
you always find people on your side
that you wish were on the other.    Thomas Berger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5