Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Lottery: maybe. Science: no. [PK / PD]

posted by nobody – 2015-01-13 18:12 (3827 d 16:37 ago) – Posting: # 14282
Views: 9,534

Maybe we should collect some data to support the nonsense-theory for this parameter?

I will post here additional studies as I find them...

The really disturbing part is: Even if someone would want to go "scientific" on new parameters for characterization of absorption, there is virtually no science on clinical Pk (anymore, at least regarding real studies, not simulation), as universities don't have the money, regulatory authorities have no capacity/budget, industry/CROs are not interested in systematic research...

Or do I get that completely wrong?

Complete thread:

• Lottery or science? nobody 2015-01-13 10:21 
  • Lottery or science? ElMaestro 2015-01-13 10:38
    • Lottery or science? nobody 2015-01-13 10:45
      • Lottery or science? ElMaestro 2015-01-13 11:05
        • Lottery or science? nobody 2015-01-13 11:23
          • Lottery: maybe. Science: no. Helmut 2015-01-13 13:50
            • Lottery: maybe. Science: occasionally ElMaestro 2015-01-13 16:45
              • Lottery: maybe. Science: occasionally nobody 2015-01-13 17:16
            • Lottery: maybe. Science: no.nobody 2015-01-13 17:12
              • post additional studies ElMaestro 2015-01-13 17:46
                • post additional studies nobody 2015-01-13 18:28
              • Historic abstract of Cmin in BE Helmut 2015-01-14 01:42
                • Historic abstract of Cmin in BE nobody 2015-01-14 08:42