Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy Latest Posts Abbreviations

statistically significant ≠ clinically relevant [General Statistics]

posted by Sivakrishna – India, 2020-10-09 12:24 (1730 d 04:30 ago) – Posting: # 21985
Views: 4,221

I would like to say Thank you sir for your valuable information. This may be helpful to my question.

Thanks and Regards
G. Siva Krishna Teja.

Complete thread:

Treatment effect justification Sivakrishna 2020-10-07 08:15
- Treatment effect justification ElMaestro 2020-10-07 10:19
- statistically significant ≠ clinically relevant Helmut 2020-10-07 11:07
  - statistically significant ≠ clinically relevantSivakrishna 2020-10-09 10:24
    - Problems with low variability Helmut 2020-10-09 15:04

Admin contact
23,427 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,684 registered users;
31 visitors (0 registered, 31 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:55 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

In the field of observation,
chance favors only the mind that is prepared. Louis Pasteur

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz

Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

statistically significant ≠ clinically relevant [General Sta­tis­tics]

Complete thread:

statistically significant ≠ clinically relevant [General Statistics]