Why BE testing use 90 CI [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2019-03-04 00:07 (2321 d 00:41 ago) – Posting: # 19992
Views: 5,674

Dear Akash,

❝ This is where the 90% CI comes into the equation. There is a (not more than) 5% risk associated with it (1-2*alpha).


My understanding of the reason why: the true T/R ratio cannot be at the same time lower than 0.8 and higher than 1.25. So even if you test the lower limit with a 5 % risk, and the higher limit with a 5 % risk, the overall risk still remains 5 % for the patients, not 10 %.

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,430 posts in 4,931 threads, 1,673 registered users;
42 visitors (0 registered, 42 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:49 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To know that we know what we know,
and to know that we do not know what we do not know,
that is true knowledge.    Nicolaus Copernicus

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5