Why BE testing use 90 CI [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by akash – India, 2019-02-23 09:39 (2329 d 18:55 ago) – Posting: # 19967
Views: 6,574

Why Bioequivalence testing makes use of the 90 CI why not 95 CI which gives more accuracy?


Edit: Category changed; see also this post #1. Please follow the Forum’s Policy[Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,430 posts in 4,931 threads, 1,675 registered users;
68 visitors (0 registered, 68 guests [including 16 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:35 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It has yet to be proven
that intelligence has any survival value.    Arthur C. Clarke

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5