Why BE testing use 90 CI [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by akash – India, 2019-02-23 09:39 (2321 d 18:58 ago) – Posting: # 19967
Views: 6,545

Why Bioequivalence testing makes use of the 90 CI why not 95 CI which gives more accuracy?


Edit: Category changed; see also this post #1. Please follow the Forum’s Policy[Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,425 posts in 4,928 threads, 1,683 registered users;
48 visitors (0 registered, 48 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:38 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

You can do one of two things; just shut up,
which is something I don’t find easy,
or learn an awful lot very fast,
which is what I tried to do.    Jane Fonda

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5