1–2α CI and TOST at α 0.05 [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by GM – India, 2017-03-28 08:50 (3026 d 05:35 ago) – Posting: # 17190
Views: 10,510

❝ ❝ If the 90%CI is one side of hundred, i.e. either (85.00-98.00) or (102.00-119.00) then there should be significant treatment effect. Is this statement correct...?


❝ Absolutely.


Hi Helmut,

Thank you for the reply.

I was also found that most of the cases above statement is correct only. But I have a situation where treatment effect is not significant even the calculated 90%CI falls one side of hundred. Is it possible..?

Actually I was used Proc GLM in SAS for this 2×2 crossover study with the model statement mentioned below:

model logCmax = Sequence Period Form Cohort Form*Cohort Subject(Sequence*Cohort)/ SS3;

Cohort was mentioned as a fixed effect because the study conducts in two groups.

The fixed effects mentioned in above the model will effect the treatment effect...? Please explain.

Regards,
GM.

Best Regards,
GM

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,428 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,683 registered users;
49 visitors (0 registered, 49 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:25 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To know that we know what we know,
and to know that we do not know what we do not know,
that is true knowledge.    Nicolaus Copernicus

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5