Cmax [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by DavidManteigas – Portugal, 2016-08-08 13:10 (3256 d 02:42 ago) – Posting: # 16540
Views: 4,446

Assuming that you're asking about widening the acceptance criteria, at least for EMA and FDA that would be impossible. The definition of highly variable drugs is clear in both EMA and FDA guidances. No drug is considered highly variable by itself. In fact, the same drug could be highly variable in one study and fail to met the criteria in another different study. As far as I know, fed studies likely produce results with higher variability so the same drug may be considered "highly variable" in the fed study but fail to met the criteria for the fasting study.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,428 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,698 registered users;
104 visitors (0 registered, 104 guests [including 20 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:53 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority
is not using his intelligence;
he is just using his memory.    Leonardo da Vinci

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5