S×F vari­­ance: Typo. [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2015-01-08 18:32 (3835 d 10:26 ago) – Posting: # 14257
Views: 42,779

(edited on 2015-01-08 19:49)

Hi Helmut,

He basically said computation #2 is pointless at this stage. He said the 0.03 is NOT a criteria, it's an "allowance". In that case then Computation #2 is just for data collection... Also I brought up the S2D computation suggested by Ana (see my post to Angus in this thread) using ABE output (G-matrix). He said it is nonsense (I assume I interpreted the equations correctly to him. I did tell him her computation involves using between-subject variances).

Nope, no Absinthe, just a glass of wine :-)
On another note, ever tried a liquor called "Ever Clear"? 190 Proof... :surprised:

John

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,428 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,687 registered users;
57 visitors (0 registered, 57 guests [including 17 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:58 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To know that we know what we know,
and to know that we do not know what we do not know,
that is true knowledge.    Nicolaus Copernicus

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5