Keeping subjects in mixed-effects models [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2014-01-24 05:18 (4184 d 10:11 ago) – Posting: # 12253
Views: 7,584

Hi Angus,

short answer: Perform the analysis exactly as you have specified it in the protocol. :-D

OK, more serious now. I guess the reference treatment was in fasted state. If R was in period 3, bad luck – no test-ratios. For the FDA the standard setup is a mixed-effects model (also the default in PHX). Try to remove the subject – you should get the same results as if keeping him/her.
If you administered in period 3 one of the tests, keep him/her. You’ll loose one degree of freedom in the respective pairwise comparison (say T1/R), but still have the full set for the other (T2/R). Nothing to worry about.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,428 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,687 registered users;
35 visitors (0 registered, 35 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:29 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

If I’d observed all the rules,
I’d never have got anywhere.    Marilyn Monroe

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5