Log in
RegisterMultiplicative of untransformed = additive of transformed [General Statistics]
posted by Helmut 
– Vienna, Austria, 2013-08-28 15:56 (4334 d 19:43 ago) – Posting: # 11369
Views: 3,608
Hi ElMaestro & Jérôme,
Oh no! Of course it should read “untransformed”. THX for finding this error!
❝ ❝ Why in the bebac presentations there is multiplicative model roughly the same with “*” instead of “+” and withoud the nested part “SUi|SEj” I have found in other references? Any relevant links?
❝
❝ Yeah, even oracles make mistakes.
❝ "Xijk: ln-transformed response of j-th subject" he meant un-transformed as long as we have * signs between factors.
Oh no! Of course it should read “untransformed”. THX for finding this error!
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
Helmut Schütz
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- Theoretical questions about cross-over model Jérôme Martin 2013-08-27 18:28
![[Mix]](https://static.bebac.at/img/mix.png "open in Mix view")
- Theoretical questions about cross-over model ElMaestro 2013-08-27 19:52
- Multiplicative of untransformed = additive of transformedHelmut 2013-08-28 13:56
- Theoretical questions about cross-over model ElMaestro 2013-08-27 19:52
Ing. Helmut Schütz