Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy Latest Posts Abbreviations

‘Add-on’ design? [Study Performance]

posted by jag009 – NJ, 2018-02-21 21:24 (2691 d 16:05 ago) – Posting: # 18440
Views: 6,609

Helmut!
I think he meant to run new studies and wanted to transfer IPs from the completed studies etc etc... I think...
John

Complete thread:

Shortage of retention quantity nlpati 2018-02-19 11:10
- Retention samples Ohlbe 2018-02-19 11:43
  - Retention samples nlpati 2018-02-22 08:06
- ‘Add-on’ design? Helmut 2018-02-19 12:44
  - ‘Add-on’ design?jag009 2018-02-21 20:24
  - ‘Add-on’ design? nlpati 2018-02-22 08:12
    - Homework Ohlbe 2018-02-22 10:19

Admin contact
23,427 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,676 registered users;
39 visitors (0 registered, 39 guests [including 17 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:29 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Many people tend to look at programming styles and languages like religions:
if you belong to one, you cannot belong to others.
But this analogy is another fallacy. Niklaus Wirth

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz

Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

‘Add-on’ design? [Study Per­for­mance]

Complete thread:

‘Add-on’ design? [Study Performance]