Backups: rather not [Study Per­for­mance]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2015-02-03 15:54 (3810 d 04:27 ago) – Posting: # 14367
Views: 5,701

Hi Mittyr,

❝ 1. Backups. […]


❝ For me it looks strange. What do you think about this procedure?


Outdated. We abandoned it 20 years ago. Nowadays you should start with the estimated sample size plus some additional subjects according to the expected dropout rate. Even, if you don’t add subjects the loss in power is less than most people think. See this thread; you could loose a lot of subjects until power substantially decreases.
Detlew implemented some useful functions in PowerTOST last October. Try:

library(PowerTOSt)
pa.ABE(CV=0.21, minpower=0.7)


In your example (n 22) with five (!) dropouts you still have 72% power.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,430 posts in 4,931 threads, 1,677 registered users;
60 visitors (0 registered, 60 guests [including 16 identified bots]).
Forum time: 21:21 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To know that we know what we know,
and to know that we do not know what we do not know,
that is true knowledge.    Nicolaus Copernicus

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5