corrected data in PHX/WNL [Study Per­for­mance]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2014-07-27 03:37 (3998 d 16:13 ago) – Posting: # 13317
Views: 19,324

Hi Khaoula!

❝ […] can you use the right results and recalculate it with your software kinetica v5 and Phoenix/WinNonlin?


Meanwhile I retired the machine where Kinetica is installed on. Results from Phoenix/WinNonlin 6.3:

Hypothesis       DF    SS        MS       F_stat  P_value
Period            1  0.206671  0.206671  0.55377  0.47002
Sequence*Patient 13  4.851704  0.373208  7.80516  0.00036
Sequence          1  0.087929  0.087929  1.83892  0.19816
Formulation       1  0.202662  0.202662  4.23841  0.06014
Error            13  0.621602  0.047816

RefLSM  6.1477 (RefGeoLSM  467.64)
TestLSM 6.3125 (TestGeoLSM 551.40)
Diff    0.1647 (SE 0.08002, df 13)

T/R 117.91% [90% CI: 102.33%, 135.86%]

Parameter              Estimate
Var(Sequence*Patient)  0.162696
Var(Residual)          0.047816
Intersubject CV        0.420332
Intrasubject CV        0.221308


Checks:
T/R = 100(551.40/467.64) = 100ℯ0.1647 = 117.91%
90% CI = 100ℯ0.1647±1.7709√0.047816(1/(2×8)+1/(2×7)) = 102.33–135.86%
CV% = 100√0.047816 – 1 = 21.13%

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,428 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,684 registered users;
99 visitors (0 registered, 99 guests [including 19 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:51 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

No matter what side of the argument you are on,
you always find people on your side
that you wish were on the other.    Thomas Berger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5