Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Randomisation? [Study Per­for­mance]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2014-06-10 03:00 (4044 d 03:57 ago) – Posting: # 13046
Views: 19,083

Hi Khaoula and Helmut,

❝ ❝ I havnt randomisation of subject 15, and then they put the result in kinetica they excluded him,

❝

❝ The randomization of an excluded subject is not required anyhow.

I think what was meant was that the allocated sequence for subject 15 is unknown/missing/evaporated/gone/lost? If aiming for balance which is standard you may be able to guess it pretty well provided the sequences of the other 8+7 subjects are correct
Anyways, guessing isn't science, and I just wonder how such an event could happen - could you comment, Khaoula? How could info on randomisation for a single subject be missing?

Complete thread:

• randomization khaoula 2014-06-06 14:04 
  • Imbalanced cross-overs Helmut 2014-06-06 14:47
    • Imbalanced cross-overs khaoula 2014-06-06 16:03
      • CV 0.03%? Helmut 2014-06-07 13:52
      • Imbalanced cross-overs jag009 2014-06-09 15:36
        • Imbalanced cross-overs khaoula 2014-06-09 22:07
          • Bag full of bugs Helmut 2014-06-10 00:37
            • Randomisation?ElMaestro 2014-06-10 01:00
              • Randomisation? Helmut 2014-06-10 14:53
                • Randomisation? khaoula 2014-06-11 00:17
                  • Problems resolved? Helmut 2014-06-11 02:01
                    • Problems resolved? khaoula 2014-07-24 13:36
                      • corrected data in PHX/WNL Helmut 2014-07-27 01:37
          • Which version of Kinetica? Helmut 2014-06-11 19:51
            • Which version of Kinetica? khaoula 2014-06-12 00:41
            • Which version of Kinetica? khaoula 2014-07-25 00:49
              • adjusted means (aka LSMs) Helmut 2014-07-27 02:23
                • adjusted means (aka LSMs) khaoula 2014-08-25 21:41