A Nightmare on Elm Street [Study Per­for­mance]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-09-13 02:55 (4315 d 10:05 ago) – Posting: # 11490
Views: 10,142

Hi John,

❝ It's not described on the protocol and CRO's SOP doesn't have this.


So in the protocol they simply copypasted from the guidance “AUC0-4, AUC4-t, AUC0-∞, and Cmax, where AUC0-4 is the area under the plasma-concentration vs. time curve from 0 to 4 hours, AUC4-t is area under the curve from 4 hours to the last measurable time point” without stating the algo? Brilliant. Which software are they using?

❝ They have the following:

❝ 3.5 hr with a time deviation of 45 mins; Reason - Restick

❝ 4 hr with a time deviation of 15 mins; Reason - Restick


Splendid. As you posted before I thought I have seen everything – but this?!

❝ The concentration values are different.


Sure. AP hits.

❝ How the hell do you tackle this??? Should I take the average of the two concentrations and use only the 4 hr time point?


The latter (OK, the second one at 4:15). Set the first one to “missing”, “not reportable“, or “oops”.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,427 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,682 registered users;
68 visitors (0 registered, 68 guests [including 17 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:00 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

No matter what side of the argument you are on,
you always find people on your side
that you wish were on the other.    Thomas Berger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5