pAUCs - the SEQUEL [Study Per­for­mance]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2013-09-12 22:48 (4318 d 17:56 ago) – Posting: # 11489
Views: 10,060

Hi Helmut,

❝ Why not? As you know we work on the same drugs (pAUCs standard). Never had a problem. Of course I describe the procedure in the protocol and even give an example plot similar to that one …


That's the beauty of it. It's not described on the protocol and CRO's SOP doesn't have this. Of course I can do a supplmental analysis myself...

❝ I thought that you don’t have the 3.5 sample (delayed till 4:11)? But you have the one at 4:02. Interpolate between this one and the one before. If you feel that you are reaching to far “to the left”, drop the AUCs and keep the Cmax.


Oh something NEW has popped up (I was looking at 50% of the subject, now I have 100%). They have the following:

3.5 hr with a time deviation of 45 mins; Reason - Restick
4 hr with a time deviation of 15 mins; Reason - Restick
The concentration values are different.

@$^% !!!!! How the hell do you tackle this??? Should I take the average of the two concentrations and use only the 4 hr time point?

John

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,428 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,682 registered users;
50 visitors (0 registered, 50 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:44 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To know that we know what we know,
and to know that we do not know what we do not know,
that is true knowledge.    Nicolaus Copernicus

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5