Snafued! [Study Per­for­mance]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-09-09 23:55 (4318 d 12:55 ago) – Posting: # 11466
Views: 10,358

Hi Ohlbe & John,

Unbelievable snafu:
3:30 ⇒ 4:11
4:00 ⇒ 4:02

I hope they had no barcode-/CDMS in place. Such data might foul up the entire data base. At least in our validation we did not challenge the system with a later sample harvested earlier than the ‘previous’ one. Wacky.

❝ With the CRO, I have a pretty good idea :stop:


:ok: What was going on in their wetware? Lights on, nobody at home?

❝ ❝ how do you deal with PK if you need to calculate partial AUC0-4 ?


In Phoenix no need to worry. Like in this post.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,427 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,682 registered users;
49 visitors (0 registered, 49 guests [including 18 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:50 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

No matter what side of the argument you are on,
you always find people on your side
that you wish were on the other.    Thomas Berger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5