WTF ? [Study Per­for­mance]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2013-09-09 23:26 (4319 d 21:55 ago) – Posting: # 11465
Views: 10,317

Hi John,

❝ 3.5 hr blood draw has time deviation of +41 mins.

❝ 4 hr blood draw has time deviation of +2 mins.


How did they manage to collect the 3.5 hr sample after the 4 hr sample :surprised: ?

❝ how do you deal with PK if you need to calculate partial AUC0-4 ?


With PK, no idea. With the CRO, I have a pretty good idea :stop:

Unless the staff were kept busy by a serious adverse event and had more urgent things to do, I can't see how they managed to f... up that much. Even with a blocked canula they should be able to collect the sample via a fresh venipuncture. Or did they have no spare phlebotomist at hand ?

OK, I know it doesn't help, sorry...

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,428 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,697 registered users;
58 visitors (0 registered, 58 guests [including 16 identified bots]).
Forum time: 21:22 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority
is not using his intelligence;
he is just using his memory.    Leonardo da Vinci

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5